\u201cWriters, publishers, musicians, photographers, movie producers and newspapers have rejected the Labour government\u2019s plan to create a copyright exemption to help artificial intelligence companies train their algorithms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In a joint statement, bodies representing thousands of creatives dismissed the proposal made by ministers on Tuesday that would allow companies such as Open AI, Google and Meta to train their AI systems on published works unless their owners actively opt out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Creative Rights in AI Coalition (Crac) said existing copyright laws must be respected and enforced rather than degraded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The coalition includes the British Phonographic Industry, the Independent Society of Musicians, the Motion Picture Association and the Society of Authors as well as Mumsnet, the Guardian, Financial Times, Telegraph, Getty Images, the Daily Mail Group and Newsquest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The creative industries want the onus to be on generative AI developers to seek permission, agree licences and pay rights holders if they want to train algorithms with the power to write, and make moving images, pictures and music.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The joint statement from the creative industries, shared with the Guardian, said: \u201cRights holders do not support the new exception to copyright proposed. In fact, rights holders consider that the priority should be to ensure that current copyright laws are respected and enforceable. The only way to guarantee creative control and spur a dynamic licensing – and generative AI – market is for the onus to be on generative AI developers to seek permission and engage with rights holders to agree licences.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Information taken from The Guardian <\/p>\n\n\n\n