{"id":10402,"date":"2025-03-06T11:29:18","date_gmt":"2025-03-06T16:29:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/?p=10402"},"modified":"2025-03-06T11:29:19","modified_gmt":"2025-03-06T16:29:19","slug":"supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/","title":{"rendered":"SUPREME COURT DENIES CERT ON SECTION 101, FRAUDULENT PROCUREMENT OF TRADEMARK PETITIONS."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>\u201cOn Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court denied petitions for writ of&nbsp;certiorari&nbsp;in several appeals involving intellectual property claims. These denials included yet another Section 101 case seeking clarity on the court\u2019s two-step eligibility test and a suit seeking vacatur of a stipulated settlement for trademark infringement involving a fraudulently procured mark. The Supreme Court also granted a motion by patent owner Cellspin Soft allowing it to file its petition for writ with a supplemental appendix under seal.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Impact Engine v. Google: No Clarity on Lodestar of Section 101 Patentability Analysis<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>In early February, Internet ad platform developer Impact Engine&nbsp;<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/ipwatchdog.com\/2025\/02\/05\/impact-engine-latest-ask-scotus-fix-federal-circuits-alice-analysis\/id=185626\/\"><em>filed its petition for writ<\/em><\/a><em>&nbsp;to appeal the Federal Circuit\u2019s ruling from last July affirming the invalidation of Impact Engine\u2019s patent claims to web-based advertisement systems under&nbsp;<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/35\/101\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>35 U.S.C. \u00a7 101<\/em><\/a><em>. Reviewing&nbsp;de novo&nbsp;the Southern District of California\u2019s Section 101 rulings at the motion to dismiss and summary judgment stages, the CAFC panel majority&nbsp;<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cafc.uscourts.gov\/opinions-orders\/22-2291.OPINION.7-3-2024_2344303.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>found<\/em><\/a><em>&nbsp;that Impact Engine\u2019s patent claims were directed to the abstract idea of processing user-provided information to create user-tailored outputs, including claims having a project viewer limitation that limited the alleged abstract idea to a specific, discrete implementation, according to Impact Engine.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Dissenting-in-part to the CAFC majority was Circuit Judge Jimmie Reyna. Although Judge Reyna concurred with most of the ruling, he disagreed with the majority\u2019s treatment of the project viewer claims. Judge Reyna would have vacated the district court\u2019s summary judgment ruling as to those claims, arguing that the district court did not sufficiently analyze the project viewer limitation under the two-step framework for means-plus-function claims.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Impact Engine\u2019s now-denied\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/24\/24-836\/341695\/20250203112327817_2025.02.03%20Impact%20Engine%20Petition%20for%20Certiorari.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>petition for writ<\/em><\/a><em>\u00a0asked the Supreme Court to clarify if the lodestar of Section 101 patent eligibility is preventing preemption of basic technological or scientific building blocks, and whether courts, when analyzing inventions claimed in purely functional terms under\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/35\/112\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>35 U.S.C. \u00a7 112(f)<\/em><\/a><em>\u00a0for purposes of Section 101 patent eligibility, must consider the specific corresponding structure defining the patent claim\u2019s scope.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Information taken from ipwatchdog. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/dc-judge-gives-control-of-proud-boys-trademark-to-black-church-attacked-by-far-right-group\/\">https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/dc-judge-gives-control-of-proud-boys-trademark-to-black-church-attacked-by-far-right-group\/<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cOn Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court denied petitions for writ of&nbsp;certiorari&nbsp;in several appeals involving intellectual property claims. These denials included yet another [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":10403,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SUPREME COURT DENIES CERT ON SECTION 101, FRAUDULENT PROCUREMENT OF TRADEMARK PETITIONS. - Provimarcas<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SUPREME COURT DENIES CERT ON SECTION 101, FRAUDULENT PROCUREMENT OF TRADEMARK PETITIONS. - Provimarcas\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u201cOn Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court denied petitions for writ of&nbsp;certiorari&nbsp;in several appeals involving intellectual property claims. These denials included yet another [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Provimarcas\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/provimarcas\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-06T16:29:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-06T16:29:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/SUPREME-COURT-DENIES-CERT-ON-SECTION-101-FRAUDULENT-PROCUREMENT-OF-TRADEMARK-PETITIONS.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1671\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1114\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Paulina\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Paulina\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Paulina\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7d5bd4e128127041f65306151a79d5be\"},\"headline\":\"SUPREME COURT DENIES CERT ON SECTION 101, FRAUDULENT PROCUREMENT OF TRADEMARK PETITIONS.\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-06T16:29:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-06T16:29:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/\"},\"wordCount\":358,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/SUPREME-COURT-DENIES-CERT-ON-SECTION-101-FRAUDULENT-PROCUREMENT-OF-TRADEMARK-PETITIONS.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Ingles\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/\",\"name\":\"SUPREME COURT DENIES CERT ON SECTION 101, FRAUDULENT PROCUREMENT OF TRADEMARK PETITIONS. - Provimarcas\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/SUPREME-COURT-DENIES-CERT-ON-SECTION-101-FRAUDULENT-PROCUREMENT-OF-TRADEMARK-PETITIONS.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-06T16:29:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-06T16:29:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/SUPREME-COURT-DENIES-CERT-ON-SECTION-101-FRAUDULENT-PROCUREMENT-OF-TRADEMARK-PETITIONS.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/SUPREME-COURT-DENIES-CERT-ON-SECTION-101-FRAUDULENT-PROCUREMENT-OF-TRADEMARK-PETITIONS.png\",\"width\":1671,\"height\":1114},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SUPREME COURT DENIES CERT ON SECTION 101, FRAUDULENT PROCUREMENT OF TRADEMARK PETITIONS.\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/\",\"name\":\"Provimarcas\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Provimarcas\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/ingles_mobile-provimarcas.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/ingles_mobile-provimarcas.jpg\",\"width\":480,\"height\":420,\"caption\":\"Provimarcas\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/provimarcas\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7d5bd4e128127041f65306151a79d5be\",\"name\":\"Paulina\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d736cf8fba37316224357341441b8043?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d736cf8fba37316224357341441b8043?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Paulina\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/author\/paulina\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SUPREME COURT DENIES CERT ON SECTION 101, FRAUDULENT PROCUREMENT OF TRADEMARK PETITIONS. - Provimarcas","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SUPREME COURT DENIES CERT ON SECTION 101, FRAUDULENT PROCUREMENT OF TRADEMARK PETITIONS. - Provimarcas","og_description":"\u201cOn Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court denied petitions for writ of&nbsp;certiorari&nbsp;in several appeals involving intellectual property claims. These denials included yet another [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/","og_site_name":"Provimarcas","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/provimarcas","article_published_time":"2025-03-06T16:29:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-06T16:29:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1671,"height":1114,"url":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/SUPREME-COURT-DENIES-CERT-ON-SECTION-101-FRAUDULENT-PROCUREMENT-OF-TRADEMARK-PETITIONS.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Paulina","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Paulina","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/"},"author":{"name":"Paulina","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7d5bd4e128127041f65306151a79d5be"},"headline":"SUPREME COURT DENIES CERT ON SECTION 101, FRAUDULENT PROCUREMENT OF TRADEMARK PETITIONS.","datePublished":"2025-03-06T16:29:18+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-06T16:29:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/"},"wordCount":358,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/SUPREME-COURT-DENIES-CERT-ON-SECTION-101-FRAUDULENT-PROCUREMENT-OF-TRADEMARK-PETITIONS.png","articleSection":["Ingles"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/","url":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/","name":"SUPREME COURT DENIES CERT ON SECTION 101, FRAUDULENT PROCUREMENT OF TRADEMARK PETITIONS. - Provimarcas","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/SUPREME-COURT-DENIES-CERT-ON-SECTION-101-FRAUDULENT-PROCUREMENT-OF-TRADEMARK-PETITIONS.png","datePublished":"2025-03-06T16:29:18+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-06T16:29:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/SUPREME-COURT-DENIES-CERT-ON-SECTION-101-FRAUDULENT-PROCUREMENT-OF-TRADEMARK-PETITIONS.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/SUPREME-COURT-DENIES-CERT-ON-SECTION-101-FRAUDULENT-PROCUREMENT-OF-TRADEMARK-PETITIONS.png","width":1671,"height":1114},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/supreme-court-denies-cert-on-section-101-fraudulent-procurement-of-trademark-petitions\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SUPREME COURT DENIES CERT ON SECTION 101, FRAUDULENT PROCUREMENT OF TRADEMARK PETITIONS."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/","name":"Provimarcas","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#organization","name":"Provimarcas","url":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/ingles_mobile-provimarcas.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/ingles_mobile-provimarcas.jpg","width":480,"height":420,"caption":"Provimarcas"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/provimarcas"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7d5bd4e128127041f65306151a79d5be","name":"Paulina","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d736cf8fba37316224357341441b8043?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d736cf8fba37316224357341441b8043?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Paulina"},"url":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/author\/paulina\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10402"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10402"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10402\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10404,"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10402\/revisions\/10404"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10403"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10402"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10402"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10402"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}