{"id":13447,"date":"2025-10-02T07:41:48","date_gmt":"2025-10-02T12:41:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/?p=13447"},"modified":"2025-10-02T08:02:49","modified_gmt":"2025-10-02T13:02:49","slug":"cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/","title":{"rendered":"CAFC DELIVERS MIXED DECISION ON PATENT, TRADEMARK AND TRADE DRESS CLAIMS FOR HOOKLESS SHOWER CURTAINS"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u201cThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Tuesday issued a precedential decision in <\/em>Focus Products Group International, LLC v. Kartri Sales Co., Inc.<\/em><\/a>, affirming-in-part, reversing-in-part, vacating-in-part, and remanding for a new trial involving patent, trademark, and trade dress infringement claims related to \u201chookless\u201d shower curtains.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The opinion, authored by Circuit Judge Chen, with Chief Judge Moore and Circuit Judge Clevenger joining, held that while the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York properly denied Kartri Sales Co., Inc.\u2019s and Marquis Mills, International, Inc.\u2019s venue transfer motion and unclean hands defense, it erred in several of its infringement findings and damages awards.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Focus Products Group International, LLC and related entities had \u201cinvented and obtained several patents on a type of shower curtain\u2014a \u2018hookless\u2019 curtain\u2014that does not require hooks to attach the curtain to a shower rod but instead provides a series of openings along the curtain\u2019s top end, reinforced by rings, to receive the shower rod.\u201d The U.S. Patent Nos. 6,494,248, 7,296,609, and 8,235,088, explain that the openings and reinforcing rings are designed to permit \u201ca curtain\u2026to be attached to a mounting rod without the need for hanging support hooks [or] clips\u2026while also avoiding the need to remove the rod from its supports.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Focus sold its patented shower curtains under the HOOKLESS\u00ae and EZ ON trademarks and claimed trade dress rights in the overall appearance of the curtains.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The dispute began when Focus sent a cease-and-desist letter to Kartri in February 2015, \u201casserting infringement of Focus\u2019s three utility patents\u201d and informing Kartri that it was not authorized to use Focus\u2019s patented technology on its \u201cEzy-Hang\u201d shower curtains. Although Kartri forwarded the letter to its supplier, Marquis, \u201cneither Kartri nor Marquis took any immediate action because Marquis was assured by its Chinese supplier that its hook-free shower curtain did not infringe any existing patents.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Focus filed the lawsuit against Kartri in June 2015, and later amended its complaint to include Marquis as a defendant, alleging infringement of the asserted patents, trademarks, and trade dress.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Regarding venue, Kartri and Marqui had raised their objections approximately four months after the Supreme Court\u2019s decision in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC in a joint letter to the court. The district court denied the motion, reasoning that appellants had \u201cforfeited [their] venue objection by failing to raise it seasonably, by formally submitting to the cause, and by actively conducting litigation in this venue after issuance of TC Heartland.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The district court had denied Kartri and Marquis\u2019 motion to transfer venue in part because it was not timely raised. It then granted summary judgment of patent infringement for Focus, finding that Kartri and Marquis infringed various claims of the asserted patents \u201cbased on the district court\u2019s claim constructions.\u201d The district court also \u201cdenied Appellants\u2019 unclean hands defense because it was improperly raised on the eve of trial.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

After a bench trial, the district court found that \u201cKartri infringed Focus\u2019s HOOKLESS\u00ae trademark\u201d and that both Kartri and Marquis  infringed Focus\u2019s EZ ON trademark, as well as Focus\u2019s shower curtain trade dress. The district court also found that the infringement of Focus\u2019 patents and trade dress was willful and awarded lost profits, reasonable royalty, and attorneys\u2019 fees to Focus.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court\u2019s denial of the venue transfer motion. The CAFC panel found that the district court \u201csoundly exercised its discretion in finding that Kartri\u2019s venue objection simply took too long,\u201d noting that \u201cTC Heartland was published on May 22, 2017, but neither Marquis nor Kartri raised any venue objection until September 18, 2017.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Federal Circuit\u2019s most detailed analysis concerned the patent infringement claims, particularly regarding the \u2018248 and \u2018609 patents. The court found that \u201cthe prosecution histories of the relevant asserted patents show that the patent owner clearly disavowed a ring having a flat upper edge.\u201d Since \u201cthe accused products only contain rings with a flat upper edge,\u201d the court reversed the district court\u2019s patent infringement determination for the \u2018248 and \u2018609 patents.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

During prosecution of the \u2018248 patent, \u201cthe examiner identified that these claims were directed to multiple patentably distinct species and instructed the patentee to elect one species for continued prosecution on the merits.\u201d Focus elected a species that excluded rings with flat upper edges, and when the examiner later found that a dependent claim reciting \u201ca flat upper edge\u201d was \u201cdrawn to a nonelected species,\u201d Focus did not object to its withdrawal.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The court emphasized that \u201cby cooperating with the examiner\u2019s repeated demand to exclude rings with a flat upper edge from the \u2018248 and \u2018609 patents, in keeping with the initial restriction requirement, the patent owner made it clear that it accepted the narrowed claim scope for these patents.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Federal Circuit also reversed the EZ ON trademark infringement finding against both Kartri and Marquis due to Focus\u2019 failure to establish standing and vacated the HOOKLESS\u00ae trademark infringement finding against Kartri because it agreed the district court erred in its likelihood of confusion analysis. The court further vacated the trade dress infringement finding and the willfulness determination, instructing that \u201con remand, the court should determine if Kartri\u2019s belief was reasonable.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

As to Marquis\u2019 Unclean Hands assertion against Focus, the CAFC was not persuaded by Marquis\u2019 argument that Focus\u2019 decision to delay filing of its terminal disclaimer for the \u2018088 patent only after succeeding on claim construction constituted bad faith conduct. It therefore affirmed the district court\u2019s denial of this defense as improperly raised.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The court also vacated the attorneys\u2019 fees award, finding it \u201cnecessary to recalculate the sum of attorneys\u2019 fees to correctly apportion fees related to work where Focus still maintains prevailing party status.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Information take from : https:\/\/ipwatchdog.com\/2025\/09\/30\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-patent-trademark-trade-dress-claims-hookless-shower-curtains\/id=192738\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

#Patent #Trademark<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u201cThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Tuesday issued a precedential decision in Focus Products Group International, LLC v. […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":13448,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nCAFC DELIVERS MIXED DECISION ON PATENT, TRADEMARK AND TRADE DRESS CLAIMS FOR HOOKLESS SHOWER CURTAINS - Provimarcas<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CAFC DELIVERS MIXED DECISION ON PATENT, TRADEMARK AND TRADE DRESS CLAIMS FOR HOOKLESS SHOWER CURTAINS - Provimarcas\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u201cThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Tuesday issued a precedential decision in Focus Products Group International, LLC v. […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Provimarcas\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/provimarcas\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-02T12:41:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-02T13:02:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Depositphotos_417844404_XL.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"377\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Paulina\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Paulina\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Paulina\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7d5bd4e128127041f65306151a79d5be\"},\"headline\":\"CAFC DELIVERS MIXED DECISION ON PATENT, TRADEMARK AND TRADE DRESS CLAIMS FOR HOOKLESS SHOWER CURTAINS\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-02T12:41:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-02T13:02:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/\"},\"wordCount\":981,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Depositphotos_417844404_XL.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Ingles\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/\",\"name\":\"CAFC DELIVERS MIXED DECISION ON PATENT, TRADEMARK AND TRADE DRESS CLAIMS FOR HOOKLESS SHOWER CURTAINS - Provimarcas\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Depositphotos_417844404_XL.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-02T12:41:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-02T13:02:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Depositphotos_417844404_XL.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Depositphotos_417844404_XL.jpg\",\"width\":500,\"height\":377},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CAFC DELIVERS MIXED DECISION ON PATENT, TRADEMARK AND TRADE DRESS CLAIMS FOR HOOKLESS SHOWER CURTAINS\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/\",\"name\":\"Provimarcas\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Provimarcas\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/ingles_mobile-provimarcas.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/ingles_mobile-provimarcas.jpg\",\"width\":480,\"height\":420,\"caption\":\"Provimarcas\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/provimarcas\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7d5bd4e128127041f65306151a79d5be\",\"name\":\"Paulina\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d736cf8fba37316224357341441b8043?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d736cf8fba37316224357341441b8043?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Paulina\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/author\/paulina\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CAFC DELIVERS MIXED DECISION ON PATENT, TRADEMARK AND TRADE DRESS CLAIMS FOR HOOKLESS SHOWER CURTAINS - Provimarcas","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CAFC DELIVERS MIXED DECISION ON PATENT, TRADEMARK AND TRADE DRESS CLAIMS FOR HOOKLESS SHOWER CURTAINS - Provimarcas","og_description":"\u201cThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Tuesday issued a precedential decision in Focus Products Group International, LLC v. […]","og_url":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/","og_site_name":"Provimarcas","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/provimarcas","article_published_time":"2025-10-02T12:41:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-02T13:02:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":500,"height":377,"url":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Depositphotos_417844404_XL.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Paulina","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Paulina","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/"},"author":{"name":"Paulina","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7d5bd4e128127041f65306151a79d5be"},"headline":"CAFC DELIVERS MIXED DECISION ON PATENT, TRADEMARK AND TRADE DRESS CLAIMS FOR HOOKLESS SHOWER CURTAINS","datePublished":"2025-10-02T12:41:48+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-02T13:02:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/"},"wordCount":981,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Depositphotos_417844404_XL.jpg","articleSection":["Ingles"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/","url":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/","name":"CAFC DELIVERS MIXED DECISION ON PATENT, TRADEMARK AND TRADE DRESS CLAIMS FOR HOOKLESS SHOWER CURTAINS - Provimarcas","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Depositphotos_417844404_XL.jpg","datePublished":"2025-10-02T12:41:48+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-02T13:02:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Depositphotos_417844404_XL.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Depositphotos_417844404_XL.jpg","width":500,"height":377},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/cafc-delivers-mixed-decision-on-patent-trademark-and-trade-dress-claims-for-hookless-shower-curtains\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CAFC DELIVERS MIXED DECISION ON PATENT, TRADEMARK AND TRADE DRESS CLAIMS FOR HOOKLESS SHOWER CURTAINS"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/","name":"Provimarcas","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#organization","name":"Provimarcas","url":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/ingles_mobile-provimarcas.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/ingles_mobile-provimarcas.jpg","width":480,"height":420,"caption":"Provimarcas"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/provimarcas"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7d5bd4e128127041f65306151a79d5be","name":"Paulina","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d736cf8fba37316224357341441b8043?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d736cf8fba37316224357341441b8043?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Paulina"},"url":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/author\/paulina\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13447"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13447"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13447\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13449,"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13447\/revisions\/13449"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13448"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/provimarcas.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}